Hruska v. Chandler Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Justice.
This case arose as a result of the assignment by petitioner, Chandler Associates, Inc. (Chandler), of respondent Paul J. Hrus-ka’s employment agreement and covenant not to compete to Pendle-Hansen-Bagne, Inc. and owner Scott Bagne as part of the sale of an insurance agency. The trial court granted Hruska’s claim for additional salary pursuant to the employment agreement, denied his claims for commissions for new business brought to the agency and penalties for late payment of his salary, and refused to admit parol evidence supporting Hruska’s claim for additional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. KammeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- International Travel Arrangers v. NWA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.