Legal Opinion

Noll v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1992No. 00412PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge.

This appeal follows the grant of Plaintiffs’/Appellees’ (the Nolls’) motion to amend their complaint and the denial of Defendant’s/Appellant’s (Sta-Rite’s) motion to amend its answer and new matter. We quash in part and remand in part.

This action arose out of an accident in which the plaintiff/appellee, Christopher Noll, was rendered a quadraplegic as a result of diving into a swimming pool from starting blocks anchored to the pool by bolts. The pool was located at the Westshore branch of the YMCA. The accident took place on May 17, 1987, and the complaint in this action was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. McCormick v. Columbus Conveyer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Misitis v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Central Lithograph Co. v. Eatmor Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Noll by Noll v. Harrisburg Area YMCASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Altoona Area School District v. CampbellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Foust v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Beaver v. DANSK INDUSTRI SYNDICAT A/S (DISA)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API