Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Columbus Conveyer Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1989No. 5 M.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*522OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Appellant James F. McCormick was permanently partially disabled when his right arm caught in the belt conveyor of a coal delivery system while he was working in the powerhouse at Bucknell University. He and his wife brought this products liability action alleging that Columbus Conveyor Company, Rust Engineering Company, and Sordoni Construction Company “jointly and severally designed, manufactured, and sold” the system, and that its defective design and manufacture was the direct and proximate cause of McCormick’s injury.

Rust and Sordoni filed motions for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Martin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Mitchell v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. Tick, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Leach v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Barsebäck Kraft AB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Board of Revision of Taxes, City of Philadelphia v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Sharon Gill, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API