Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Lienhard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1933No. Appeal, 83PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

May 3, 1933:

This case originated in the filing of a mechanic’s lien, Judgment was entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, from which this appeal was taken. Under the terms of a bailment lease agreement, plaintiff installed an automatic sprinkler system in a large public garage owned by the defendant. The installation was part of the original construction of the building. The lease provided for a rental of $10,125, to be paid in five annual installments of $2,025 each, and when all the installments were pMd, defendant was to have the option of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Holt v. HenleySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Central Lithograph Co. v. Eatmor Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Cagey, J., Aplt. v. PennDOTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Beardell v. Western Wayne School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Smith v. WeaverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Canon-McMillan School District v. BioniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API