Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Kuss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed -December 6, 1927:

Rosenberry, J.

There is a printed case of 374 pages, supplemental case of 74 pages, and briefs covering 343 pages. Manifestly we cannot set forth in detail the matters covered by the very voluminous record, case, and briefs. We shall confine ourselves to stating such facts as are necessary to a disposition of the questions raised.

The' first contention of the plaintiff is that the bank was not a creditor of J. F. Sparks and therefore not entitled to *381maintain the action begun by it in which the attachment was levied. The plaintiff concedes that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. First Wisconsin National Bank v. JahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. H. W. Wright Lumber Co. v. McCordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In re Farmers' Co-operative Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1913
  5. Fuller & Fuller Co. v. McHenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rascar, Inc. v. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  4. Charnesky v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  5. Garrity v. GarrityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API