First Wisconsin National Bank v. Jahn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
It is not claimed that the facts stated as separate defenses in the answer of the defendant Amalie Jahn, to which a demurrer is interposed, constitute a defense upon any other ground than that Amalie Jahn is a married woman. The facts alleged show that she was clearly an accommodation indorser and by the indorsement of the note in suit became in legal effect surety for the debt of a third person, the transaction in no way con'cerning or relating to her separate estate. Under such circumstances it is claimed she cannot be charged in an action at law, she being a married woman. Bailey v. Fink,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Krouskop v. ShontzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Conway v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Fuller & Fuller Co. v. McHenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Bailey v. FinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Taylor v. DorseySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan SistersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Sparks v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.