Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Heldenfels

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1963No. A-9623PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Roman Hernandez recovered a judgment against Heldenfels Brothers, a partnership, based upon personal injuries suffered by him when he was struck by a truck loaded with asphalt. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed upon the ground that Hernandez was a mere licensee upon the premises where he was injured and that Heldenfels, as the “occupier” of such premises was not guilty of a breach of duty owed to Hernandez. Tex.Civ.App., 366 S.W.2d 641. The premises were owned by Southwestern Oil & Refining Company who was the employer of Hernandez. At the time of injury, Hernandez and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Carlisle v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Collins v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hicks v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hall v. Medical Bldg. of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Villegas v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kelley-Coppedge, Inc. v. Highlands Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Yowell v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API