Legal Opinion

Estate of Sessions

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1915No. S. F. No. 7396PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The appeal herein is from an order distributing the estate of the testatrix, Ellen Sessions, to her legal heirs, instead of to the heirs of William E. Jackson, who was named in her will as her residuary legatee.

Ellen Sessions died on August 5, 1913. William E. Jackson, the residuary legatee, died in 1911. He was not akin to the testatrix. The sole question presented for determination is whether the residuary bequest to Jackson lapsed upon his death, or whether it should be given to his heirs because of certain words in the residuary clause which, it is claimed, are words of substitution. With…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In Re the Estate of TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of BrunetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Freyermuth v. SpeckterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Mockbee v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API