Legal Opinion

Freyermuth v. Speckter

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1949No. S. F. No. 17639PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

By a holographic will dated October 1, 1941, the testator devised “To Otto Speckter or his Estate The Property at Clear Lake & Improvements on same.” Speckter, who was not related to the testator, died on July 1, 1943. The testator died on May 14, 1945. In the course of administration the property at Clear Lake was sold, and the decree of distribution awarded the proceeds of the sale “to the heirs or devisees of Otto Speckter, deceased, subject to the administration of his estate.” Appellants, executors and legatees under the will, appeal from the decree of distribution.

The only question…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. In Re Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of ReslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Estate of BrunetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Estate of CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API