Legal Opinion

Estate of Brunet

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1949No. S. F. No. 17639PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.2d 105 (1949)

Estate of GASTON J. BRUNET, Deceased. O. G. FREYERMUTH et al., Appellants,

v.

MARY SPECKTER, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 17639.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 28, 1949.

Marion Vecki for Appellants.

W. S. Solari and Albert Picard for Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

By a holographic will dated October 1, 1941, the testator devised "To Otto Speckter or his Estate The Property at Clear Lake & Improvements on same." Speckter, who was not related to the testator, died on July 1, 1943. The testator died on May 14, 1945. In the course of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. In Re Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of ReslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Estate of CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Estate of HalsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API