Legal Opinion

People v. Standley

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1932No. Docket No. 2195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

The information upon which appellant was tried contained ten counts. The trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, and appellant was found not guilty upon nine counts and guilty upon one count—count VII. From the judgment entered against him upon count VII, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant takes this appeal.

The count of the information upon which appellant was found guilty charged that appellant “did wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and knowingly procure and offer to be filed, registered and recorded, a false and forged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. BaenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. ChretienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API