Legal Opinion
A.M. Castle & Co. v. United Steelworkers of America
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 21, 1995No. 94 CV 6857PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, Chief Judge.
A.M. Castle & Co. (Castle), a manufacturer of metal products, brings this action against the United Steelworkers of America (USWA), a union representing workers at several of Castle’s plants. In 1993, Castle and USWA signed a collective bargaining agreement that included a provision for a 401(k) plan to be made available to USWA members working for Castle. In a five-count complaint Castle seeks a declaration that the 401(k) provision is void. USWA has moved for summary judgment, arguing that the collective bargaining agreement requires Castle and USWA to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Creative Telecommunications, Inc. v. BreedenDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1999
- Local Union 1253, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. S/L Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Segar v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006