Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . Edmunds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1918PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by defendant from 'Blum, J., at January Term, 1918, of Eobsvth. This is an action to set aside a deed upon tbe ground of fraud and mistake. The jury having found the issues in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant excepted and appealed from the judgment thereon.

1Opinion of the CourtClare, C. J.

The plaintiffs conveyed to Edmunds and Jerome the property in controversy, which is a strip 10 feet wide and 610 feet long, and allege that the deed was executed through mistake on their part and fraud or mistake on the part of the defendant Edmunds. They further allege that the defendant Edmunds designedly sent the deed for said strip to the plaintiff together with deeds for property covered by the written agreement, which written agreement did not include this strip, for the purpose of having it executed along with the other deeds at the same time, and thus fraudulently obtain title to said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. White Sewing MacHine Co. v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Dellinger v. . GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Hargett v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Furst & Thomas v. MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API