State ex rel. Leach v. Schotten
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Leach had to establish that he possesses a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that Schotten is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that Leach has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Carter v. Wilkinson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 65, 637 N.E.2d 1.
Leach contends in his first proposition of law that a regulation of a state correctional facility which has the effect of completely prohibiting inmates from getting married while incarcerated is not reasonably related to legitimate penological interests and is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Carter v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Snider v. StapletonOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Buehl v. LehmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Strothers v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Mackey v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Strothers v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Chavis v. Griffin, Unpublished Decision (6-15-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000