State ex rel. Strothers v. Turner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Strothers asserts that he is entitled to the requested writ of mandamus pursuant to R.C. 2935.09. For the reasons that follow, we find this assertion to be meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
While R.C. 2935.09 provides that a “private citizen having knowledge of the facts” shall file with a judge, clerk of court, or magistrate an affidavit charging an offense committed in order to cause the arrest or prosecution of the person charged, it must be read in pari materia with R.C. 2935.10, which prescribes the subsequent procedure to be followed. State v. Holbert (1974), 38…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HolbertOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Leach v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by24 opinions
- State ex rel. Bunting v. Styer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Blachere v. TyackOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State ex rel. Whittaker v. Lucas Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Boylen v. HarmonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Thomas v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.