Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Strothers v. Turner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1997No. 97-444PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Strothers asserts that he is entitled to the requested writ of mandamus pursuant to R.C. 2935.09. For the reasons that follow, we find this assertion to be meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

While R.C. 2935.09 provides that a “private citizen having knowledge of the facts” shall file with a judge, clerk of court, or magistrate an affidavit charging an offense committed in order to cause the arrest or prosecution of the person charged, it must be read in pari materia with R.C. 2935.10, which prescribes the subsequent procedure to be followed. State v. Holbert (1974), 38…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HolbertOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Leach v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bunting v. Styer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State ex rel. Blachere v. TyackOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State ex rel. Whittaker v. Lucas Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Boylen v. HarmonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Thomas v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API