Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Carter v. Wilkinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1994No. 94-806PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Carter has to establish that he possesses a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that Carter has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 42, 15 O.O.3d 53, 399 N.E.2d 81, paragraph one of the syllabus.

Carter based his entitlement to the requested relief on R.C. 2967.18(A), which provides:

*66“Whenever the director of rehabilitation and correction determines that the total population of state penal or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Hickman v. CapotsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hammond v. DallmanOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Duncan v. Chippewa Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Savarese v. Buckeye Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API