Legal Opinion

Fontaine v. Storrie

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1935No. Civ. 9633PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

By this action plaintiff, a subcontractor, seeks to foreclose a lien based upon the balance due under his contract. The original contractor and his sureties are joined as defendants. The trial court denied all relief to plaintiff, with the exception that it gave him a personal judgment against the original contractor in the sum of $3,500. Plaintiff now appeals from the judgment.. In the early part of 1925, Feather River Power Company was the owner of Buck’s Creek project in Plumas County. On October 30, 1925, R. C. Storrie and Company, a copartnership composed of Robert B.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Cline v. YamagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. BerndtMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brand v. RiemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Timboe v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API