Timboe v. Clark
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TODD TIMBOE, Case No. 3:20-cv-08719-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 53 10 WESLEY CLARK, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Todd Timboe alleges that the defendants in this suit fraudulently induced him into 14 a short-term, high-payout loan on a troubled hotel project. The defendants move to dismiss, 15 arguing that Timboe’s claims are barred by statutes of limitations and are inadequately pleaded. 16 The motion to dismiss is granted because, as currently pleaded, the claims are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.