Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to County Court, of Lake County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

The principal error assigned and argued in this court relates to the admission in evidence of certain declarations made by an agent. These declarations *606are material, and if erroneously received the judgment must be reversed. We shall assume that the evidence establishes an agency, though the matter is not entirely free from doubt.

Plaintiff in error, who was defendant below, hired from Curtis a team and wagon, to be used in transporting lumber from Leadville to a neighboring town. One Thompson was employed by her to drive the team. On the return trip the horses ran away, injuring themselves,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luby v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Hazleton v. Union Bank of ColumbusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. EhmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Emerson v. BurnettColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Fisher v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. WatsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API