Legal Opinion

Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1916No. 8351PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Otero District Court. Hon. C. S. Essex, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, J.

*1131. May 28, 1911, Bennett and son, as copartners, spoken of as plaintiffs, filed a complaint in the District Court of Otero County alleging in substance that the Fort Lyon Canal Company, defendant, below, plaintiff in error, owned and operated a canal called the Fort Lyon Storage canal or supply ditch, constructed to divert and carry water from the Arkansas river, for storage in a reservoir; that plaintiffs were engaged in the business of farming a certain tract of arid land constituting part of the Holbrook Irrigation District, and irrigated from the Holbrook canal, an irrigating ditch…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MaherIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Kernochan v. . N.Y.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Alden v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. In Re Witherill's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. McNulty v. DurhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API