Legal Opinion

People v. Nunley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1904No. Crim. No. 1053PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Nutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Defendant was informed against for the crime of grand larceny,—viz., the stealing of a horse,— and "having been convicted thereof, was adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison for the term of ten years. He appeals from the judgment and- an order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. It is claimed that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to set aside the information. The ground stated in support of the motion was, so far as is material here, that prior to the filing of the information the defendant had not been legally held to answer by a magistrate, in that—

1. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. McIntyreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. BannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. People v. GarbuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. TeixeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API