Legal Opinion

People v. McIntyre

California Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1900No. Crim. No. 553PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.;

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

When the case was called for trial, the complaining witness failing to appear, the district attorney was permitted to read in evidence, against defendant’s objection, the' deposition of said witness given on the preliminary examination of defendant in the police court. The only question involved in this appeal is as to the correctness of this ruling.

1. It is objected that the transcript was not certified as required by law. Section…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McNeil v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. NunleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API