Legal Opinion

Shull v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 10, 1981No. Nos. 16-, 332-, 333-, 352-, 356- and 409-78PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The above-numbered cases between the same plaintiff and defendant were consolidated by order of the trial judge and are now before this court on cross-motions for summary judgment. There is no issue of material fact. We hold in defendant’s favor and dismiss all petitions.

Plaintiff, John C. Shull, a United States citizen residing in the Philippines, brings these six pro se actions against the United States seeking a total of $21,923.27. The parties have apparently agreed to consolidation and disposition by summary judgment in light of the common issues involved and plaintiffs residence in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richard E. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Koster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Louis J. Rodrigue, Administrator of the Estate of William J. Rodrigue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API