Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 27, 1981No. 180-80CPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before the court without oral argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, we allow that motion in part. On the court’s own motion, we dismiss as beyond our jurisdiction plaintiffs claims in part. We remand the remainder of plaintiffs claims to our trial division for further proceedings.

Plaintiff Allen was "recruited” by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to provide confidential information. During 1978 and 1979, plaintiff was paid sums of money aggregating $15,000. The parties seem to agree that plaintiffs information contributed, at least…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Contreras v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API