Legal Opinion

Preferred Financial Corp. v. Quality Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1989No. CO-88-1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant contends that it was an error of law not to submit the matter to arbitration upon post-trial motion. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1984 respondent, Quality Homes, Inc., purchased a computer system from the predecessor of Pinetree Business Systems, Inc. (Pinetree) under a lease arrangement with Preferred Financial Corp. (Preferred) for the purposes of financing. Respondent experienced problems with the system after delivery. A substitute system also performed inadequately and respondent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Carl H. Neuman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Otis G. Pike, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Kempf v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. County of Hennepin v. Ada-Bec SystemsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fort Snelling State Park Ass'n v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Brodsky v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Hughes v. LundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Fedie v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API