Fisher & Ball v. Carter
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jefferson District Court. — Seneca Cornell, Judge. Action for commission alleged to have been earned in finding a purchaser for land resulted in a judgment as prayed.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
tion: separate counts for one recovery: right to submission: brokers. I. ■ The petition is in two counts, one alleging the employment of plaintiffs by defendant to find a purchaser for his farm in Kansas, and the reasonable value of so doing, -and the other alleging an agreement to pay $1 per acre for such services. Counsel for appellant contends that there was no evidence tending to support the first count, and there*638fore that the court erred irr submitting to the jury whether plaintiffs should recover on a quantum meruit. Fisher testified that defendant first came into the office of Ball &…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Bowden v. AchorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Redman v. MurrelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goodale v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Barron v. PigmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Ransom-Ellis Co. v. EppelsheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Brintnall v. Professional Investors of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Donahoe v. GagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.