Legal Opinion

Brintnall v. Professional Investors of Iowa, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1974No. 55926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeGRAND, Justice.

The active parties to this appeal are Joyce E. Brintnall as plaintiff and Verdón L. Farmer as intervenor, each of whom claims the right to $3,500.00 interest due Professional Investors of Iowa, Inc. (defendant) from Micro-Technology, Inc. (garnishee) on a promissory note between those two parties. Trial to the court resulted in judgment for plaintiff and the in-tervenor appeals. We affirm the trial court.

The financial background of this dispute is important in understanding the circumstances under which the controversy arose. In 1969 Professional Investors of Iowa, Inc. was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. U. S. Homes, Inc. v. YatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Worez v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Barron v. PigmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Noble v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Fisher & Ball v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Railroad Management Co. v. CFS Louisiana Midstream Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API