Legal Opinion
Custom Rubber Corp. v. ATS Specialized, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 7, 2009No. Case 1:07 CV 2593PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KENNETH S. McHARGH, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 6, 2008 Defendant ATS Specialized, Inc. (“ATS”) filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiffs Claim for Attorney Fees Under the Carmack Amendment against Plaintiff Custom Rubber Corporation (“Custom Rubber”). (Doc. 34). Custom Rubber filed an opposition on August 14, 2008, and ATS filed a reply on August 29, 2008. (Doc. 37, 40). On August 28, 2008, Custom Rubber filed a Motion for Summary Judgment against ATS. (Doe. 39). ATS filed its own Motion for Summary Judgment against Custom Rubber on September…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vargo-Schaper Ex Rel. Schaper v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- G & P Trucking Co. v. Zurich American Insurance ex rel. SKF USA, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Build 4 Impact, Inc. v. Panther II Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Fields v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.