Legal Opinion

State v. White

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2004No. Nos. 2003-1048 and 2003-1049PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} The issue certified for our review is whether, pursuant to R.C. 2949.14 and R.C. 2947.23, a trial court may assess court costs against an indigent defendant convicted of a felony as part of the sentence. Although this question was presented as a single issue, there are two questions to be answered: first, whether a court may assess costs against an indigent defendant; and, second, whether those costs may be collected. We hold that such costs may be assessed and collected.

*581{¶ 2} Appellant Terry White pleaded no contest to a charge of possession of cocaine, in violation of R.C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. James v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bernardini v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 2010

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API