Legal Opinion

Bell v. Horton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2001No. Case No. 99CA2530PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

On December 14, 1999, appellant filed a notice of appeal from the November 16, 1999 judgment granting the motion of appellees Charlotte Horton, Tim Horton, Dennis Dennewitz, and Kathy Dennewitz for summary judgment and dismissing the action. Appellees contend that the November 16 judgment did not resolve all of the claims of all of the parties; thus, it is not a final appealable order. We have considered the memoranda filed by the parties regarding the jurisdictional issue.

Appellate courts in Ohio have jurisdiction to review the final orders or judgments of inferior courts within their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Production Credit Association v. HedgesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Bell v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Keith v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Huntsman v. Aultman Hosp., 2006 Ca 00331 (5-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Downs v. PaniotoOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Board of State Teachers Retirement System v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API