People v. Lichtenstein
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George A. Knight, Harry E. Michael, and Knight & Heggerty, for Appellants. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, John H. Riordan, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendants, having been jointly tried and convicted of the crime of conspiracy, as defined by section 182 of the Penal Code, under an indictment jointly charging them with that offense, have brought the cause to this court by an appeal from the judgment and the order denying them a new trial.
The assignments against the legality of the verdict are: 1. That the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict; 2. Erroneous admission of certain testimony; 3. Errors in changing the trial judge during the trial of the cause and before it was completed.
The specific charge in the indictment is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. HaydonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Sewell v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. SantamariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. TokichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.