Legal Opinion

Revis v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

The issuable fact arising upon the pleadings in this ■case, pertinent to this appeal, is whether the defendant, the city of .Asheville, in its construction, operation, and maintenance of a swimming ;pool in a recreation park, was engaged in a business enterprise for profit •or in the performance of a governmental function. "Whether the defendant carried accident and liability insurance upon its amusement devices and facilities, particularly the swimming pool, was no more than a probative fact, the allegation of which the judge, in the exercise of his discretion, could order stricken from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Wooden v. StrewNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Commissioners of Yancey Co. v. PiercySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Herndon v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API