Revis v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
The issuable fact arising upon the pleadings in this ■case, pertinent to this appeal, is whether the defendant, the city of .Asheville, in its construction, operation, and maintenance of a swimming ;pool in a recreation park, was engaged in a business enterprise for profit •or in the performance of a governmental function. "Whether the defendant carried accident and liability insurance upon its amusement devices and facilities, particularly the swimming pool, was no more than a probative fact, the allegation of which the judge, in the exercise of his discretion, could order stricken from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Wooden v. StrewNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Commissioners of Yancey Co. v. PiercySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
3Cited by19 opinions
- Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Herndon v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.