Legal Opinion

Consolidated National Bank v. Hayes

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1896No. L. A. No. 57PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed by Edward Hayes and Richard V. Hayes to secure payment of a promissory note made by them to the plaintiff. The note was for three thousand dollars, bearing interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum compounding quarterly, and was dated December 20, 1887, arid payable March 20, 1888. The mortgage was executed April 3, 1883.

Edward Hayes died testate on February 4,1889. His will was duly admitted to probate, and Richard V. Hayes and Edward Dougherty were appointed and duly qualified as administrators of the estate with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Perkins v. OnyettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Savings Bank of San Diego County v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Grant v. HeverinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Raggio v. PalmtagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Jones v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lisitzky v. BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API