Lisitzky v. Brady
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court of Pima county foreclosing an equitable lien on certain property. There is little if any dispute in the facts, and we state them as follows :
In July, 1926, one Haskell Cohen was the owner of a large area of land near Tucson, Arizona, which he desired to have subdivided and sold in small parcels. About this time he entered into a contract with Richard G-. Brady, a realtor in Tucson, to the effect that the latter should make various improvements thereon at his own expense, and should have the exclusive right to sell the property as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Moran v. GardemeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Morton v. Pacific Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Henderson v. TowleArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Bank of Sonoma County v. CharlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Pima County v. GrossettaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- O'Neil v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver v. PrestonWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. Babbitt Bros. Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.