Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Onyett

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1890No. 13348PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

— This action was brought upon a promissory note made in his lifetime by John Onyett, deceased, and upon a mortgage to secure it, executed by said John and his wife, Amy Onyett, on premises which constituted their homestead, the homestead being on community property. The defendants are S. B. Onyett, executor of the estate of said John, deceased, the said Amy, his widow, and Jenkin Morgan, who claims an interest in the mortgaged premises. The answer of the executor and said Amy sets up several defenses, such as payment, the statute of limitations, etc., and denies that there was ever any legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Camp v. GriderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Flynn v. DriscollIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Burke v. UngerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Dakota National Bank v. KleinschmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API