Masonic Foundation v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Is plaintiffs’ claim one of preference or one of commonalty? This is the only question. The amount is agreed upon, and all other matters were reserved for future determination.
It is not perceived upon what theory the ease can be distinguished in principle from a general deposit by any other legally self-depositing fiduciary, e.g., fiscal or financial agent (Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr., 206 N. C., 268, 173 S. E., 601; Underwood v. Hood, Comr., 205 N. C., 399, 171 S. E., 364), executor (In re Garner Banking and Trust Co., 204 N. C., 791, 168 S. E., 813), guardian (In re Home Savings Bank, 204 N.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- First & Citizens National Bank v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Roebuck v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Flack v. . Hood, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Cates v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.