Legal Opinion

Cates v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 30, 1910PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Portsmouth.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The accused, the plaintiff in error, was indicted and tried for rape. On the first trial he was found guilty of an attempt to commit the offense charged. Upon his motion, the verdict of the jury was set aside and a new trial granted him. Upon that trial, over his objection, he was tried for rape and found guilty. He moved in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, but both motions were overruled and judgment entered upon that verdict. To that judgment this writ of error was awarded.

The action-of the court in trying the accused for rape, instead of trying him for an attempt to commit that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Stuart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Velazquez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. State v. FranklinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Taylor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. State v. RorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API