Dixon Ticonderoga Co. v. United States Customs & Border Protection
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BARZILAY, Judge:
On April 4, 2005, this court entered a Judgment Order granting plaintiff Dixon Ticonderoga Co.’s (“Dixon’s”) Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record. Dixon Ticonderoga Co. v. United States Customs and Border Protection, Slip Op. 2005-46. Now defendants, United States Customs and Border Protection and Robert C. Bonner (collectively “Defendant”) ask this court to reconsider the above-mentioned judgment and opinion, to grant a rehearing, and to dismiss Dixon’s cause of action pursuant to USCIT Rule 59(a)(2). After having considered Defendant’s arguments to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Intercargo Insurance Company F/k/a International Cargo & Surety Co., (Surety for M. Genauer) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Kemira Fibres Oy v. The United States, Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce, and Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.