Legal Opinion

Chemetals, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 30, 2001No. SLIP OP. 01-35; 99-12-00741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge.

This matter is before the court on a motion for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2, brought by Kerr-McGee Chemical LLC and Cheme-tals, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), the petitioners in the underlying antidumping administrative review. At issue is Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from Greece, 64 Fed.Reg. 62,169 (Dep’t comm.1999) (final admin, rev.) [hereinafter “Final Results ”]. Plaintiffs contest the selection of home market sales for price comparison purposes. Plaintiffs also contend that inventory carrying costs should not have been included…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. The United States, and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. United Engineering & Forging v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alloy Piping Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  2. Atar, S.R.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API