Legal Opinion
Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 14, 2003No. Slip Op. 03-41; Court 99-12-00743PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
I. Standard of Review
The Court will uphold Commerce’s redetermination pursuant to the Court’s remand unless it is “unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(l)(B)(i) (1994). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peer Bearing Co.-Changshan v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Fuyao Glass Industry Group Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Fuyao Glass Industry Group Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005