Hill v. Ouzts
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
The following' are, by virtue of the demurrer, assumed to be facts: Complainants are the two minor children of Wesley Ouzts, a deceased war veteran, and together with their mother, Mrs. Gertha Lee (Ouzts) Kemp, are the sole distributees of his estate. The said veteran at his death left an estate of $5,014.50, of which amount the sum of $4,718 was the proceeds of a War Kish Insurance policy, and the sum of $296.50 represented adjusted compensation, both amounts being paid by the United States under appropriate acts of Congress. The widow of the deceased soldier was duly appointed and qualified…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Indemnity Co. v. State ex rel. GillaspyMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- De Baum v. Hulett Undertaking Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Lankford v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- Blum v. Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. TarttMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dana v. ZerkowskyMississippi Supreme Court · 1942