Legal Opinion

Ohio v. Holt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1967No. 40250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

Defendant contends that the order of the Court of Appeals granting the motion to strike the bill of exceptions *149is a final appealable order because, to use the applicable words of Section 2505.02, Revised Code, it is “an order affecting a substantial right in an action which in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment.” In so contending, he takes the position that, without a bill of exceptions, there is nothing in the record that can support an appeal and hence the order granting the motion to strike the bill of exceptions affects his substantial right of appeal and prevents a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EberhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. City of Cincinnati v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Acme Barrel & Drum Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API