Legal Opinion
People v. Osorio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 15, 2002PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*232Defendant was arraigned on the felony complaint on August 3, 1998 and, pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a), the People had six months or 184 days to be ready for trial. There are only six intervals which the court found chargeable to the People, totaling 47 days, which are challenged on this appeal.
In his moving papers, defendant stated that an accusatory instrument was filed on August 3, 1998. As a result, the People conceded that the three-day period from August 4 to August 7, 1998 was properly charged to them. Therefore, the motion court was mistaken in stating that the People conceded four days…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. DavidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. LaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BrunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. OsorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. WilliamsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
- People v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.