Legal Opinion

People v. Cortes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1992PublishedCited by 274 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Titone, J.

In each of these cases, more than two years elapsed between the filing of the initial indictment and the date the charges were dismissed because of the prosecution’s failure to satisfy the readiness prescriptions of CPL 30.30. The People have appealed from the Appellate Division orders affirming these dismissals. Their appeals raise several novel issues, including the People’s accountability for delays resulting from the failure of the County Law article 18-B Panel to promptly supply an attorney to represent defendant Cortes and for a delay that resulted from the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by274 opinions

  1. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. GossNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. BoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API