Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1993PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Under CPL 30.30 (1) (a), the People have six months, or in this case 181 days, to be ready for trial, exclusive of any periods of time properly chargeable to the defense. The question before us is whether the People should be charged with time beyond the dates to which they requested adjournments. The People contend that an adjournment which is extended because the defense rejects the original date suggested by the People should be, in part, excludable from the time chargeable to them. This argument is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. CorreaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. TavarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. GossNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. ChavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. The People v. Scott BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API