Legal Opinion

Sherrard v. After Hours, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1971No. B-2262PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Justice.

The three plaintiffs, James Sherrard, Glyen Lemmon and John Paul Wilkinson, Jr. brought this suit against After Hours, Inc. to rescind their distributorship contracts and to recover their damages caused by fraud that induced them to enter the contracts. Plaintiffs alleged that they were purposely deceived by assurances that the City of Austin would be divided into two separate territories for two rather than three distributors. A jury found for the plaintiffs and the trial court rendered a judgment in their favor. The court of civil appeals reversed and rendered judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Dial Finance & Thrift CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. National Bank & Loan Co. v. PetrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Climatic Air Distrib. of So. Tex. v. Climatic Air Sales, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Grand Prize Distributing Co. of San Antonio v. Gulf Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Nu-Enamel Paint Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Kirby v. Cruce, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Plumlee v. PaddockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Flynn Bros., Inc. v. First Medical Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API