Plumlee v. Paddock

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

Joe Plumlee appeals a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of Michael Paddock, Jim Loveless, Charles Roach and the partnership of Paddock, Loveless and Roach. Plumlee raises one point of error contending the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on his alleged referral contract with appellees. We overrule Plumlee’s sole point and affirm because the alleged contract, if one exists, was illegal and void against public policy.

Plumlee sued appellees alleging a referral contract existed whereby appellees would pay Plumlee, owner of an ambulance company, an…