National Bank & Loan Co. v. Petrie
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is an action to recover money paid to the plaintiff in error for certain bonds. One defence set up in the answer was that the bank was a national bank, and that the sale of the bonds was without the authority of the bank, and was illegal and void. Judgment went against the bank, it was affirmed by the appellate division of the Supreme Court, 46 App. Div. 634, and by the Court of Appeals, 167 N. Y. 589, and the case now comes here by writ of error. The ground of the action is that the sale ivas induced by false representations of the president of the bank. We do not state these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- McCormick v. Market BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HedrickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Murray v. HadidSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.