Legal Opinion
Nu-Enamel Paint Co. v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 15, 1933No. 12875PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNKLIN, Justice.
On the 16th day of October, 1931, the Nu-Enamel Paint Company, as seller, entered into a contract in writing with M. V. Davis, denominated as distributor, by the terms of which the seller appointed Davis “as the authorized Distributor for Nu-Enamel Products in the following territory, for a period ■of one year with renewal rights hereinafter specified. Tarrant County and the City of Port Worth and the Nu-Enamel Store located at Fourth and Main Streets, and 48 other counties lying west and northwest of Tarrant County, comprising- the West' Texas Wholesale District, all in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Alexander v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Witherspoon Oil Co. v. RandolphTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. McMullanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sherrard v. After Hours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- AFTER HOURS, INC. v. SherrardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Erickson v. Times Herald Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Vandervoort v. SansomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Athans v. RossiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.