Legal Opinion

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Strange

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1939No. 29068PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original action in this court brought by Chicka-sha Cotton Oil Company, hereafter referred to as petitioner, and its insurance carrier, to obtain a review of an award of the State Industrial Commission which held it secondarily liable for payment of compensation to M. E. Strange, hereafter referred to as respondent.

The essential facts as shown by the record are briefly these: Bert Dal-rymple, the owner of two trucks and who was engaged in the general business of hauling for hire, entered into a contract with the petitioner whereby he undertook to transport 200 or 300 tons of cotton…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Haas v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Chatham v. Arrow Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Klein v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Horwitz Iron & Metal Co. v. MylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Creighton v. District Court of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Burrows v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Londagin v. McDuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API